Pesticide Action Network (PAN) just released an almost 100-page report titled simply Glyphosate, which compiles information on the chemical, health impacts, human exposures, poisonings, environmental effects, and alternatives. If you have ever had questions about glyphosate, the answers are probably in this report. Bookmark this page, as it is the definitive work on glyphosate, which you may need to refer to at some time.

And if your questions aren’t answered in Glyphosate, there’s even more information in this article: ACTIVIST POST: Glyphosate Contaminates The Global Ecosystem: The Damning New PAN Report. This article explains in simple terms key points from the PAN report, plus gives links to many other articles on glyphosate, including a post from this very Q&A: Glyphosate Detox: How to Remove Roundup From Your Body

Pesticide Action Network (PAN) is a global network of over 600 participating nongovernmental organizations, institutions and individuals in over 90 countries working to replace the use of hazardous pesticides with ecologically sound and socially just alternatives such as agroeoclogy. PAN was founded in 1982 and has five independent, collaborating Regional Centers that implement its projects and campaigns.

Add Comment

If you experience health effects from fragrances in common consumer products, you’re not alone.

Professor Anne Steinemann—a world expert on environmental pollutants, air quality and health effects—has found that more than one-third of Americans report health problems—from asthma attacks to migraine headaches—when exposed to common consumer products that contain fragrances, such as air fresheners, cleaning supplies, laundry products, scented candles, cologne, and personal care products.

The study also found that fragranced products may affect profits, with more than 20% of respondents entering a business, but leaving as quickly as possible if they smell air fresheners or some fragranced product. More than twice as many customers would choose hotels and airplanes without fragranced air than with fragranced air.

In the workplace, over 15% of the population lost workdays or a job due to fragranced product exposure. Over 50% of Americans surveyed would prefer fragrance-free workplaces. And over 50% would prefer that health care facilities and professionals were fragrance-free.

When exposed to fragrance products, 34.7% of Americans suffer adverse health effects, such as breathing difficulties, headaches, dizziness, rashes, congestion, seizures, nausea, and a range of other physical problems. For half of these individuals, effects are potentially disabling, as defined by the Americans with Disabilities Act.

“This is a huge problem; it’s an epidemic,” says Professor Steinemann.

Professor Steinemann is especially concerned with involuntary exposure to fragranced products, or what she calls “secondhand scents.”

MEDIA RELEASE: Fragranced Products: Risks for People and Profits?

FULL ARTICLE: Fragrance consumer products: exposures and effects from emissions

Add Comment

“One out of five freight containers arriving in European ports [from Asia] has been fumigated with extremely dangerous, carcinogenic or neurotoxic gases.”

“These toxic gases are left over from the fumigation process, a necessary – sometimes mandatory – operation to kill micro-organisms and pests before transport, in order to prevent the introduction of parasites, bacteria and diseases into the importing country.

“In March 2010, the EU banned the use of methyl bromide, a dangerous pesticide — but many countries, including the U.S., still use it. What’s worse, very few countries actually indicate the presence of toxic gas on their containers, to avoid having to de-gas them.”

“Another more insidious source of toxicity, which puts port workers and consumers at risk, is the vapors emanating from the merchandise itself during transport. Furniture, shoes, clothes made in Asia – mostly Vietnam and China — frequently contain toluene and benzene solvents, which are carcinogen. When this is the case, there are no labels on the shipping container warning port workers to equip themselves against toxic fumes.

“97% of freight containers contained residues of pesticide fumigants and toxic industrial chemicals, mostly 1.2-dichloroethane and methyl bromide, as well as benzene and toluene. About 19% of them had levels exceeding the permitted exposure level. The German researchers told the congress that the fumigants and toxic products “contaminated the transported goods, penetrating into them and settling there.”

These are only a few of the facts reported in the article below. So now we know what some of the chemicals are on imported products and how toxic they are.

WORLDCRUNCH: Toxic Shipping Containers May Be Contaminating Your Food And Clothes

Add Comment

Question from Joelle

Hi Debra,

thanks for all you do in helping families try to live as non-toxic and cleanly as possible!

I have read every single one of the Q&A’s regarding non-toxic, green, eco-friendly, sofas and I am still at a loss. I cannot afford the $5000 price tag for an organic sofa and to be honest, I do not like the looks of most of the options out there. This being said, here is my question and I would truly appreciate your input.

I am at the point where I would like to purchase the most non-toxic sofa that I can afford (Pottery Barn eco-friendly) and add [one of the room air purifiers]=(link to air filters page of Debra’s List) that you did a show on into the room. I used to have an “all or nothing” attitude about detoxing our home but the reality is that the budget will simply not allow for that and we need to get on with joyfully living!

Debra’s Answer

I think you’ve made the best decision that meets your needs.

I once had to make the decision to go work in a toxic office building, so I just took my air filter with me and put it on my desk.

It’s better that you make a less toxic choice that you can afford than make no improvement at all.

As a consumer advocate I have to give you the best choices I can and educate you about the options, and then it’s up to you to choose what is right for you. That’s why I often don’t recommend products that still have some toxic exposures that may be acceptable to some people in some circumstances.

I think you’ve done a great job at figuring this out for yourself.

The old sofa is on its last leg and its time for me to make a decision. Thanks for your help!

Add Comment

Question from Cheryl

Hi Debra,

I plan on building a home with radiant in-floor heat. What type of flooring will be safe for me with MCS?

Debra’s Answer

Well, this is a very easy question to answer because the best flooring for anyone to install over radiant heat is also the best flooring for MCS: porcelain, stone, or ceramic tile.

The radiant heat will increase the emissions of any toxic chemicals in other types of flooring, but porcelain, stone, and ceramic tile have no toxic emissions. And These materials are excellent conductors of heat (so they will collect heat and continue to release it after the radiant heating is turned off), do not expand and contract with heat, and are resistant to warping or cracking.

There may be some odor from the mortar, that should outgas quickly, and DO NOT USE GROUT SEALER. Grout sealer is very toxic.

Add Comment

Here’s a place we can cut the budget.

“Researchers estimate the United States economy takes a $340 billion hit annually as endocrine-disrupting compounds lower IQs, increase behavior problems and exacerbate health woes like obesity and diabetes.”

And that’s only endocrine disruptors.

According to a new analysis, exposure to chemicals in pesticides, toys, makeup, food packaging and detergents costs the U.S. more than $340 billion annually due to health care costs and lost wages.

“My prediction is that the calculated costs to society will increase substantially once we get better documentation on … additional substances and additional adverse effects.”

—Philippe Grandjean, Harvard University

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH NEWS: Toxic Economy: Common Chemicals Cost US Billions Every Year

THE LANCET: DIABETED & ENDOCRINOLOGY: Exposure to Endocrine-disrupting Chemicals in the USA: A Population-Based Disease Burden and Cost Analysis

Add Comment